beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고정488

명예훼손

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who served as the president of the Daegu Suwon-gu Council for the Representatives of Apartment Residents from March 2008 to August 2009, and is currently appealed after embezzlement of the above apartment management fee during the working period and being sentenced to a fine of three million won.

A. On October 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) five entrances and fences, etc. of the Daegu-gu apartment building B, Daegu-gu, and (b) the facts were not aiding and abetting the case where G was embezzled management expenses by the president of the former resident representative of the said apartment building C, Dong representative D, Dong representative E, Dong representative E, and Dong representative F, and the former resident representative of the instant apartment building F, the Defendant: (a) was stolen in cash 200 million won from the management expenses passbook around March 2014; and (b) was stolen from the head of the Tong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the former resident representative of the said apartment building C, Dong representative D, Dong representative E, Dong representative E, and Dong representative, so that many unspecified persons can be seen as being by the following: (c) KRW 2

The prosecution posted a banner stating the phrase "A, D, E, and F, Dong, Dong, Dong, Dong, of the complainant" through thorough investigation as to whether to aid and aid the building and aid, and damaged the reputation of the complainant C, such as C, D, E, and F.

B. On October 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) did not assist in the case where the president of the said apartment occupant representative C, the Dong representative D, the Dong representative E, the Dong representative F, and G of the former resident representative G was embezzled management expenses; (b) did not assist the said apartment occupant representative C, the former resident representative C, the Dong representative D, the Dong representative E, and the Dong representative F, and the former resident representative G, the Defendant urged the investigation of detention on the following grounds so that an unspecified number of people can be seen: (c) by stealing 200 million won in cash from the head of the Tong-gu management expenses passbook around March, 2014; and (d) by forceing the said individual

In addition, the first priority does not cause any additional loss by removing them.

The following reasons:

1. The fact that management expenses have been stolen by 200 million won up to now (one year and six months) has been easy and hidden (abundance and aid, and tide);

2. The fact that a false disclosure is made as if there were cash in the statement of deposit in the notice of management expenses.

3.It shall be urgent, and in the recent years, all recent losses of residents.