물품대금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasons why the party members of the court of first instance shall explain this case are changing “the obligee of the price of goods” as “the obligor of the price of goods” under Section 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the reasons why the judgment of the court of first instance is based on the reasoning of the judgment, except for adding “additional matters to be determined” as stated below, thereby admitting it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of
In addition, the defendant asserts that the contract of the first transfer and takeover of this case is the most recent contract for the J, which is the type of E, and the non-party company does not comprehensively take over the debt of E, and thus the plaintiff's claim is unjustifiable. Thus, the party to the first transfer and takeover contract of this case is J, or there is no evidence to acknowledge that the first transfer and takeover contract of this case is the most fictitious contract by the false declaration of agreement. The defendant
(In addition, the first transfer and takeover contract of this case was lawfully rescinded, terminated, or cancelled by E, or was lawfully rescinded, terminated, or cancelled by the non-party company, or there is no evidence to prove that the contract was lawfully rescinded or terminated by agreement between E and the non-party company. Thus, the defendant's argument based on the premise that the first transfer and takeover contract of this case was destroyed by the agreement of this case is also without merit).