beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단1534

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a deceased person who attended the Defendant from May 2015 to November 2017, 2017. On September 27, 2016, the Defendant is a deceased person who was a victim B (n, 29 years of age) and from May 29, 2015. The Defendant is required to purchase the real estate by the Defendant in accordance with the Section C and 402, the title “the purchase fund is necessary for the mother to purchase the real estate.”

First of all, if N.N. borrowed from a savings bank, the mother would accept the loan as collateral after purchasing real estate and immediately repay it.

However, there was no fact that the defendant's mother was trying to purchase real estate at the time, and the defendant had the victim borrow the loan and had the victim repay other debts, and the mother did not have the intent or ability to repay the money to the victim by means of receiving the real estate mortgage loan.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received money from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (D), KRW 10 million on September 27, 2016, KRW 10 million on September 28, 2016, KRW 10 million on September 29, 2016, KRW 10 million on September 30, 2016, KRW 10 million on September 30, 2016, KRW 20 million on October 21, 2016, KRW 10 million on October 31, 2016, KRW 61,80,000 on October 31, 2016, and KRW 180,000 on October 4, 2016.

2. On November 16, 2017, at around 11:23, 2017, the Defendant used a computer, etc., connected the victim’s residence, such as the victim’s cell phone (E) with the victim’s cell phone without authority, and then, entered the victim’s telephone number and authentication number, etc., and paid 30,000 won, from that time, from November 16, 2017, the Defendant paid 356,800 won in total nine times, as described in the list of crimes in the separate sheet.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the same amount of financial benefits by inputting the information without authority into the data processing device, such as computer, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;