2. Although the judgment of the court below was made, it seems that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in order to prevent him from committing the crime of this case in a relatively faithful manner with no particular criminal power in order to raise living expenses after closing down his store because he was unable to conduct his business due to a strike such as mers. Since 190, the defendant had a history of having been punished by imprisonment with prison labor and a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime. Each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant is very bad, in light of the law of crime, frequency of crime, etc., each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant. The defendant did not receive a letter from the victims because he was compensated for damage or agreed with the victims, etc., and considering the circumstances before and after preventing each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation and environment, occupation, family relation, etc., the sentence of the court below is too inappropriate.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.