2. Determination is based on the fact that the defendant reflects the judgment, that the damage is minor, and that the defendant agreed with the victim D. However, these points seems to have been considered in the court below. Although the defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime, he repeatedly committed the same crime during the period of repeated crime, and considering the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.