폭행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is that the Defendant, rather than the victim’s assault, took the victim’s humf dancing and took it into the police station, or the victim did not assault by blocking the victim from escape, but did not commit an assault by drinking flab, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The court below rejected the above assertion by the defendant, claiming the same as the reasons for appeal in this case. The court below's decision is just and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of facts as alleged by the defendant, and there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts as alleged by the defendant.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.