If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from the classification obtained, for distribution or use.

Nevertheless, on July 11, 2012, the Defendant, unlike the contents classified as a whole by the Game Rating Board in the Busan-gu Busan-gu Committee on Game Rating Board, opened and revised 20 game Matoo-20 game machine in order to prevent users from affecting the game progress by selecting only a correct answer and allowing users to select only a correct answer and providing them for their use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal to prepare a game products Rating Committee;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (report accompanied by reference materials);

1. Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 32 (1) 2 of the same Act on criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It shall be decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the main sentence of Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act or more;