2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that carries on the business of manufacturing plastic confection tapes and other surface content products.

The Defendant supplied “PE tape” (hereinafter “PE tape”) to the Plaintiff from March 2012 to May 31, 2016, as a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling “pE tape for the protection of the surface,” which is dried and dried on the surface protection vinyl. The Defendant supplied “PE tape” (hereinafter “PE tape”) to the Plaintiff from March 2012 to May 31, 2016.

B. C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) which is the Plaintiff’s preservative company attached polyvinyl chloride (Plyviol chiides, thermally plastic films and sets, etc. are processed; hereinafter referred to as “PVC”) to polyethylenephthalate (poly, chphthal rate, and plastic; hereinafter referred to as “PET”) supplied by D companies on the market, and then supplied the original part to the Customer by contacting the PE tape supplied by the Plaintiff.

From January 2016 to May 31, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied the PE tape (name of items: E) from the Defendant to the Defendant and gave it to C (hereinafter “instant PE tape”); and C supplied the “original group” with the aforesaid PE tape on the PVC sets to the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).

【Ground for recognition】In the absence of dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 9 (including virtual numbers)

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion F requires KRW 122,682,970 to remove or re-construction PE in F with the wind that is so strong that the instant PE tape’s gambling capacity is so strong that the PE tape is not separated, and KRW 52,167,000 to create new materials, and the Plaintiff claimed for compensation for losses to C, and C claims for the said money against the Plaintiff.

Therefore, this case's PE tape.