However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 19, 2017, at around 21:35, the Defendant driven a b gender car with approximately 0.260% alcohol content from approximately 4 km to the intersection in which it was acquired at the Gu-Eup administration principle at around the time from the border near the Pyeongtaek Dong Welfare Center located in Pyeongtaek Dong-gu, Dong-si, Dong-si, Dong-si around 362.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to make a statement on the circumstances of a driver driving and the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of protection, community service order, and order to attend a lecture, are that the blood alcohol concentration is very high at the time of the instant case, the developments leading up to crackdown, and the Defendant re-offending despite the record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant’s age, shall be determined as the same as the order