When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

A personal information manager shall not use the personal information beyond the scope prescribed by the Act, such as without consent of the subject of information.

The defendant is an auditor and auditor of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. and a person who actually operates the above company jointly with the above D.

The defendant, while operating the Inte with the term "Inte", had been in custody of the resume in which the name, resident registration number, etc. of the victim F, who served as an employee of the above company from around 2002 to 2005, was used by using the victim's personal information to use the victim's personal information to handle corporate expenses.

1. On February 28, 2014, the Defendant, through a certified tax accountant G, entered personal information, such as the victim’s name, resident registration number, etc., in the above office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., with the consent of the victim who is an owner of the information, and submitted the Mapo book, after arbitrarily entering it in the quarterly submission table of the quarterly submission of the statement of payment of daily earned income in the April 2013 belonging to the

2. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant voluntarily entered the victim’s personal information in the quarterly submission balance sheet of daily earned income in the first quarter of the year 2014-201-207, at the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and submitted it to the Mapo Tax Office.

Accordingly, the defendant used personal information on two occasions without the consent of the victim F who is the subject of information.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Second prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the accused (including D and F large part);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to filing a complaint (including evidence 2 and accompanying documents);

1. Article 71 subparagraph 2 of the Personal Information Protection Act and Article 18 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information and the Selection of Punishment for Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a provisional payment order shall be issued.