When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 21, 2017, around 17:20 on July 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) laid the boxes containing the victim D’s directors at around 100,000 won, 200,000 won or more at the market price; (b) one set of KRW 200,000,000 at the market price; (c) one set of Nowon-gu in an amount equivalent to KRW 500,000 at the market price; (d) one set of 1,000,000,000 won at the market price; and (e) one set of auxiliary fold in an amount equivalent to KRW 20,00,00 at the market price; and (e) carried the boxes leading the victim D’s directors at the 1st floor of Mapo-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property equivalent to the market price of 1.2 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. In the investigation report (in the event of an accident), investigation report (related to the attachment of CCTV image data in the event of a crime) (the defendant and his defense counsel did not contain the winners at the time, and the clothes were set up within them, and some parts of them were contained in a vinyl, and the defendant thought them as a burner.

The argument is asserted.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, the boxes, which suffered damage, were placed in front of the entrance, and there was a separate place where wastes were discarded in the Bara building. The Defendant confirmed by CCTV image, the frequency of moving the goods to the Bara, the type of the goods brought by the Defendant, the type of the goods brought by the Defendant, the packing condition of the damaged goods, and the victim’s statement as to the packing condition of the damaged goods, even if the third party removed the packages of the boxes or partly brought the goods, the victim’s goods still were stored in the box in a very clean state.

In light of the fact that the Defendant had the intention to commit the theft at the time of bringing the wounded, etc.

full recognition may be accepted.

(a) h.