If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 02:40 on September 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) expressed a bath to security guards C in front of B Apartment B apartment 207 dong 207, the victim D (Nam, 30 years of age) who had been living in the front of the Twit-dong 207 entrance, called “her parents would be you?” and the victim’s face was 3-4 times as a horse, and the victim’s face was 3-4 times as a drink, and the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as a b1-day b1-day catus.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At around 02:40 on September 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 201, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol in the Pakistan B apartment, sent the victim C (Nam, 75 years of age) (a security guard) who was in front of the said apartment 207 dong, with an “entry Chewing fewk kkk, by opening an entrance,” and (b) her humb, who was the Defendant’s house, she committed assault against the victim by putting the victim under the Defendant’s humb to the elevator, by neglecting the Defendant’s humb.

2. We examine the judgment, and the facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the will expressed by the victim under Article 260(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, since the victim appeared in this court on April 16, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, and withdraws his wish to punish the defendant, this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.