However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date of the judgment.

Defendants are those who sell relief clothes under the trade name of “C”.

On April 13, 2018, the Defendants conspired to steal clothes from the “F” store located adjacent to the store, which was located adjacent to the store, in Goyang-si, Yongsan-gu, Ilyang-si, the Defendant purchased clothes at the “F” store located adjacent to the store. The Defendants conspired to steal the victim’s relief clothes by additionally putting clothes that were stolen from the warehouse on the plastic bags that provide for the use of the clothes at the store, and then putting them on the lane in the way of placing them on the lane.

On April 30, 2018, the Defendants purchased an amount of money equivalent to 53,00 won for relief in the above store and contained it in the vinyl. After reporting the network, Defendant B accessed the plastic bag containing clothes into the warehouse, and Defendant B stolen the relief items in the middle of the market price on six occasions from that time to that time by putting the relief items in the plastic bag containing the relief items stored therein into the plastic bag, and then cutting off the relief items in the middle of the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the statement of a victim related to additional damage amount, on-site holding office, and the verification of CCTV for violence);

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be mitigated in amount: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the following unfair reference among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The Defendants under suspended execution: (a) the instant crime was committed on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (refluence of favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing) by additionally putting clothes that the Defendants stolen in a plastic bag which provides for the Defendants to put in a store after the delivery of clothes, and thus, the commission of the crime is not weak in light of the method and frequency of the crime.

However, the defendants are against each of the crimes of this case.