If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2019. 9. 28. 05:20경 창원시 마산회원구 B에서 동거인 C으로부터 ‘욕설과 폭언을 한다’는 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 마산동부경찰서 D파출소 소속 경위 E, 경장 F로부터 C에게 욕설을 하며 달려드는 것을 제지당하자 욕설을 하며 손으로 경위 E의 어깨와 가슴을 밀치고, 경장 F의 어깨와 팔을 밀치고, 손등으로 경위 E의 턱을 쳐 폭행하고, 계속하여 경장 F로부터 “선생님 계속 이러시면 공무집행방해죄로 현행범으로 체포될 수 있습니다.”라는 고지를 받자 들고 있던 휴대전화를 바닥에 던지며 “씹할 오늘 저 년 죽이고 모든 것을 쫑 내자”라고 욕설을 하며 C에게 재차 달려들어 이를 제지하는 경위 E와 경장 F의 어깨와 팔, 가슴 등을 손으로 밀쳐 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above police officers and interfered with their legitimate execution of duties on the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement of police officers on each field;

1. Application of investigation reports (related to obstruction of performance of official duties), field photographs, and statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 10 million won;

2. Non-application of the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not be applied by selecting fines.

3. The Defendant rendered a sentence of sentence that obstructed the performance of official duties by assaulting two police officers by taking a bath or pushing his body.

On one occasion, police officers called up and the defendant had a mother's house, but at the same time, police officers called up again to the C's house.

However, the defendant committed the crime.