However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 2, 2014, at around 22:30, the Defendant received a report from the victim F, a police officer belonging to the Gwangju Police Station Estation, who was called to the site after receiving a 112 report that the Defendant was assaulting a female, requested the Defendant to accompany the Defendant to the police box, which was called to the site, and then sent the patrol vehicle to the patrol vehicle, and then sent the patrol vehicle to the patrol vehicle, and then cut off from the patrol vehicle, the Defendant gets off the patrol vehicle, with the Defendant display the drinking house, flaps and flaps, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer, and at the same time, sustained the victim, such as light dial flaps, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Each written statement of H and I;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act are when the accused is committed, the accused is committed, and the police officers deposit money with the police officers, and the police officers do not have any criminal records for the same kind of crime, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order; and