However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 23:00 on September 23, 2017, the Defendant did not pay the food value at the D cafeteria working for the victim C in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s restaurant for about one hour by force, such as bringing the disturbance to the restaurant employees and customers at the place where the victim was found to have caused the disturbance by a large sound.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14448, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14489, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da14489, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 200