명예훼손
Each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that at around 10:00 on November 15, 2012, the Defendants: (a) even though they did not receive activity expenses for each of the elevators and on each of the bulletin boards of the Dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and (b) the representative and female councils paid the apartment management expenses for the apartment management in the course of the apartment management office, the representative of the Dong, and the women’s association activities, the Defendants additionally paid the management expenses for the apartment. In this regard, the Defendants are able to make the apartment management expenses for the transparent attendance at the 303-dong reading center by not later than 5:0 p.m., the thickness of the prior residents living in both underground and underground, together with the purport that the management expenses for the apartment will be claimed by not later than 303 p.m. and attach the printed items, and thus, they damage the honor of the representative D, E, G, G and executive officers of the Dong by openly pointing out false facts.
2. We examine the judgment, which is a crime falling under Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act, and which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act. According to the agreement bound in the trial records of this case, it is recognized that the victims agree with the defendants after the prosecution of this case and expressed their intent not to punish the defendants. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.