The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, it is justifiable to maintain the first instance judgment convicting the Defendants of the facts charged of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. Contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds for exclusion of illegality as stipulated in

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a fine is imposed on Defendant B, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.