성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months and fines for 10,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine for negligence of 3,000,000 won, respectively.
The Defendants are the defendants.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a business owner who operates a sexual traffic business establishment that interferes with the mutual similarity of "D", and the defendant B is the head of the sexual traffic business establishment.
The Defendants leased a space of approximately 100 square meters for the first floor of the building in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, equipped with 13 marina rooms, shower rooms, female employees' rest rooms, etc., employed female employees F and G engaged in sexual intercourse with similar sexual intercourses, and decided to arrange sexual intercourses by having sexual intercourses with sexual intercourses with 60,000 won and 1.60,000 won for 90,000 won from gender-purchases and sexual intercourses with the female employees of sexual intercourses with 130,000 won and 1.60,000 won for 90,000 won and 1.6,000 won for 9,000 won and 1,000 won.
At around November 11, 2016, the Defendants conspired with the Defendants to engage in the act of similarity and arrange for the same business as from August 4, 2016 to November 11, 2016 (see, e.g., the Defendant B from October 201 to November 11, 2016).
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Some statements made to F or G concerning the suspect examination protocol of each police officer;
1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;
1. Daily account books and business registration certificates for business;
1. Application of statutes governing field enforcement photographs;
1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act
1. Defendant A who choose a sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor and fines concurrently (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic) Defendant B: Selection of a fine;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract the workhouse (the Defendants)
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;
1. (Defendant A) Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act provides for confiscation.