At the time, the victim F filed a complaint against the above church member G, the head of the administrative division H, the head of the administrative committee, I, the chairman of the finance committee against G, on the grounds that the apartment owned by the above church maintenance foundation, which is being used as a company house, was registered, transferred to G in the name of G without going through the procedures such as the approval of the church church, there has been disputes between the defendants and the above church officers and the victims.

1. Defendant A, at around 14:20 on November 27, 201, at the above 24 church meetings held on the first floor of the above church, Defendant A made a statement to the effect that the above filing of the victim’s complaint is unfair, among 100 participants of the above group, Defendant A made a statement to the effect that “F head was related to a female problem, a church’s mother, and a group of women, and a group of women, and there was a problem with another group of women. At the end of the denial decision, there was a flexible fact to the head of the church, etc., and the head of the church, who is a large number of people, left the church, and allowed a church to leave the church, which is a clean portion. Margrgrging that “I will not leave the church. I am a thickness. I am to have the thickness.”

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out facts to the effect that there is a female problem that is inappropriate for the victim and that the church was caused by these problems.

2. On November 30, 201, Defendant B made a statement to the effect that the victim’s filing of the above complaint is unfair, among 300 participants of the above meeting, at the right society monthly conference held in the right society, around 12:30 on November 30, 201, Defendant B’s remarks that the victim’s filing of the complaint is unfair.

Because of privacy, it is a good faith.