However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On 03:01 on 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the Jindong-gu, Jindong-gu, Jindong-gu, Jindong-si, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of official duties by assaulting the Defendant on the part of the Defendant, at approximately six occasions, on the part of the Defendant, in a way that he was able to return home to the Defendant under the influence of alcohol, and that the slope C belonging to the Ginsung Police Station B district, which was called out by the Defendant, was under the influence of alcohol; and (c) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, she was under the influence of alcohol, she was under the influence of alcohol, she was under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the notification of photographs and departments related to reporting 12 Incident;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The serious reflectivity and circumstances unfavorable to the circumstances leading to the crime: The scope of the recommended sentence in light of the sentencing guidelines for the inferior quantity of the crime: Six months to one year and four months; and