If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) around October 14, 2013, as a person engaged in driving BVF125 Orala; (b) around 14:10 on October 14, 2013, the Defendant operated the said Oralab in the section of approximately 200 meters of the street, which is about 16 meters from the southwest of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, to the new road located in 94, Yeongdeungpo-gu 16, Dong-dong.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as the holder of the above Oral Ba, operated the above Oral Ba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place under the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Control note;

1. Regulation mark of no traffic of two-wheeled automobiles:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 6 of Article 154 and Article 63 of the Road Traffic Act that choose a penalty, Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;