부정수표단속법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, from around 02, 1995, entered into a check contract with a branch office of the Korean Standards Dr. Cranchi Bank and the Defendant, and entered into a check contract in the name of the Defendant from around 02, 1995.
On November 05, 2012, the Defendant issued one check number E, face value E, 30 million won, and one check number per bank under the Defendant’s name on the date of issuance on October 05, 2013, within the C office operated by the Defendant in Seoul Central-gu.
The holder of the check at issue presented the payment of the check on October 05, 2013, which was within the period of time when payment was made.
However, the Defendant did not pay the above check as a disposition of suspension of transaction and did not pay the total of KRW 280,000,000 as stated in the attached list of crimes, such as the statement in the attached list of crimes.
The Defendant, “2013 Highest 1182,” located in Jung-gu, Seoul, has entered into a check agreement with the Korea Standards Bank of China and the Defendant from August 2, 1995, under the name of the Defendant, from August 2, 1995.
1. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant issued a check number F and a check number 28 million won in the name of the Defendant on April 15, 2013, at C offices operated by the Defendant in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, issued one copy of the check number per bank in the name of the Defendant, and presented a check holder a payment proposal on April 15, 2013, when the check holder was within the payment presentation period, but did not receive due to the suspension of transaction.
2. On January 5, 2013, the Defendant issued a check number G and a check number G on April 5, 2013, the date of issuance, one copy of the check number per bank in the name of the Defendant, and presented a check holder a payment proposal on April 5, 2013, when the check holder presented payment proposal, but did not receive payment due to the suspension of transaction.
Summary of Evidence
"2013 Highest 1032"
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each accusation "2013 Highest 1182";
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each written accusation;