도로교통법위반(음주운전)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On March 11, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the Ulsan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.
On March 27, 2020, at around 23:21, the Defendant driven an FST7 passenger car under the influence of alcohol from the front of the “Dju store” located in Ulsan Northern-gu B to the friendship house located in the same Gu E.
G reported 112 as it is doubtful that the above SM7 passenger car driven by the Defendant at the same time was seriously shaken and passed over the car line, and driving under the influence of alcohol is doubtful, such as the mold distance.
Then, at around 23:32 of the same day, G was waiting in the vicinity of the Madong-gu House, and G was demanded by the relevant police officer of the Ulsan East Police Station, which was called as the report of G, to explain the details of the report, and stated to the effect that the above circumstances and the Defendant appeared in the above SM7 passenger car and entered the above Magdong-gu House.
At around 23:53 on March 27, 2020, the Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the breathm in a breath of drinking alcohol measuring instrument over about 34 minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as the foregoing I and J, who is a police official, 112 reports the suspicion of drinking alcohol driving as above, rhing the horses, rhinging the horses, repeating the horses, repeating the horses, rhing the horses, failing to keep a little big and proper distance, racking red on the face, and racking the eye, etc.
Nevertheless, the defendant refused this and did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on internal investigation (investigation, etc. into the suspect's speech and behavior and control situation);
1. Investigation report (report on the circumstances of an immigration driver);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of summary order;
1. Criminal facts;