However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

On May 13, 2013, at around 07:30, the Defendant administered 0.03 grams, which were received from E, and possessed by E, at the residence of the Domocom No. 101 Eastern E, located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the statutes on response to requests for appraisal;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., for the Establishment of Relevant Acts and the elective Punishment for Crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no record of punishment for a crime related to narcotics, the fact that the person commits a mistake in depth, family relationship, etc.);

1. proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;