If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On March 21, 2011, at around 23:00, the Defendant made a proposal that he drinks in the above "E" restaurant operated by the victim D in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim refused to engage in sexual traffic and demanded payment of 320,000 won of the drinking value to the victim. As the Defendant demanded, "in the Republic of Korea, he is a light-light tin A, and he is found out of the drinking value below the drinking value," and the Defendant continued 7-8 of the beer’s disease on the table to continuously gather the victim.

As can be seen, the Defendant attempted to gain pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount by forcing the victim, who frightened the victim, to concentrate on claiming the drinking value, and the victim attempted to commit an attempted crime at the wind of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D and part of witness F's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Articles 352 and 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 352 of the same Act

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;