The sentencing of the court below (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

On November 27, 2012, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime and reflects the Defendant’s depth during the period of detention; (b) the Defendant has to support his family members, such as the labor union and the son who was in the third grade of high school who had undergone surgery, such as the pellet and the pellet surgery; (c) on the other hand, the crime related to the provision for the use of illegal game products and the operation of the illegal game room is highly harmful to the society by encouraging speculation and impairing the sound sense of work; and (d) the instant crime provided game work on the Japanese game site without being classified by using the virtual network (VPN) so it is not good that the crime was committed; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime despite the fact that the Defendant had the record of being subjected to suspended sentence for the same crime; and (c) the motive and circumstances of the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s motive and circumstances after the instant crime; and (c) the circumstances surrounding the instant crime; and (d) the circumstances of sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.