임금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. Attached Form 1 of the Judgment of the court of first instance.
1. The reasons why the court in the first instance court's explanation concerning this case are as follows, except for the following "2. Additional Determination" added to the argument emphasized by the defendant in the above court, and therefore, it is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. The defendant further determined that the defendant will not claim ordinary wages, etc. from April 1, 2014 with the plaintiffs in the future. Since the plaintiffs' claim for the increase of ordinary wages occurs due to the increase of basic rate at the same time as the plaintiffs receive daily wages, the above additional suit agreement is deemed as an additional suit agreement on the claim for wages that has already occurred, and thus, the plaintiffs' lawsuit for the above period is unlawful. According to the reasoning that it is difficult to consider that the plaintiff's claim for the payment of wages was made on the 9th day of the first instance court's 7th day of the first instance court's announcement that "the defendant's driver, including the plaintiffs, will not receive wages from the 9th day of the second instance court's announcement and the 9th day's bill.