However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 18, 2017, the Defendant was notified of the request for adjudication of the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from the police officer E, Assistant F, Assistant F, Assistant G, or police officer, who was sent to the 112 report by the 112 notification of the 112 notification of the 10th notification of the 2nd notification of the 10th notification of the 2nd notification of the 10th notification of the 2nd notification of the 10th notification of the 2nd notification of the 2nd notification of the E, E, and F, and the 2nd notification of the 3nd notification of the request for adjudication of the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement statutes to E and C;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Execution (including a large number of criminal records against the accused, but there is no same criminal record as the accused, and any contingent crime in this case