However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime, including the fact that the Defendant was committing the instant crime even after having been discovered as having engaged in money exchange, etc. in the Red Games of Gangwon-do; (b) the Defendant’s criminal records; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the application of the judgment of the court below ex officio

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the respective Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 45 subparagraph 4 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the respective Game Industry Promotion Act, and Article 45 subparagraph 4 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of respective Game Industry, "the choice of imprisonment" shall be referred to as "the use and provision of game products different from the game products whose classification has been obtained)," the choice of the relevant law and punishment on criminal facts, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 44 (1) 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 (1) 7 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and each sentence of imprisonment is revised.

.