산지관리법위반
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant C for 8 months, Defendant B and D for each fine of 4,00.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant A is the representative director of a corporation B with the objective of collecting aggregate, collecting and transporting construction wastes, and interim disposal business.
On September 27, 201 and March 15, 2012, the Defendant violated an order to reinstate a mountainous district, the form and quality of which was altered, by failing to comply therewith, despite the Defendant’s issuance of an order to restore the forest equivalent to 28,418 square meters, where recycled aggregates, etc. are loaded, among 40,260 square meters of forest land located in Daegu-siF following the revocation of approval for the establishment of a factory and the expiration of the period for conversion of a mountainous district, by removing aggregate from July 31, 2012.
2. The Defendant Company B violated the Defendant’s order to restore the mountainous district to its original state, by failing to comply with the order, even though the Defendant, whose representative was the Defendant, received an order to restore the mountainous district to its original state, such as paragraph 1 of the Daegu North
3. The Defendant C is the actual operator of a G Co., Ltd. with the objective of collecting, transporting, disposing of, and recycling commercial wastes.
On September 27, 201 and March 15, 2012, the Defendant violated an order to reinstate a mountainous district, the alteration of form and quality of which was changed, by failing to comply with the order to restore the mountainous district to its original state, even though the Defendant received an order to remove aggregate from July 31, 2012, the amount equivalent to 20,910 square meters of recycled aggregates, etc., located in Busan Metropolitan City F following the revocation of permission for extension of mountainous district conversion from the Daegu-do Free Economic Zone Authority.
4. G Co., Ltd. violated the Defendant’s order to restore the mountainous district to its original state by failing to comply with the order, even though C, the actual operator of the Defendant, was ordered to restore the Defendant’s business to its original state, such as Daegu North Korean Free Economic Zone Authority
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and C;
1. Statement of the police statement related H;
1. Answer to a request for re-extension of the period of measures to restore the mountainous district or its original state;