The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that all charges of this case were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against the logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the intentional act, legitimate act, self-defense, self-defense, acts of expression, mistake of law, possibility of criticism,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.