마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant was to cooperate in the investigation of narcotics.
However, the defendant not only has been punished seven times for the same crime, but also has been released from prison by committing the same crime, and there is a high risk of recidivism by committing the crime again for two months.
In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of crime, and consequences as shown in the records and pleadings, all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the commission of crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is difficult to view it as unfair because it is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.