However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 7. 26. 21:45 경 구리시 B에 있는 ‘C’ 호프집 앞에서 지인과 이야기를 나누던 중 피해자 D(57 세) 이 욕설을 하는 것에 화가 나 그곳 테이블 위에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 재떨이로 피해자의 머리를 때려 치료 일수 미상의 머리 부위를 3 바늘 꿰매는 정도의 상해를 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A photograph of the victim, a photograph of the victim himself/herself, or a photograph of the part concerning the injury of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written agreement;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the degree of injury to the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not weak; and (b) the fact that the defendant had been guilty of violence three times is disadvantageous to the defendant; or (c) the fact that the defendant is in profoundly against the defendant; and (d) the victim and the victim do not want the punishment against the defendant by smoothly