특수상해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Seized golf products (No. 5 Linagle, No. 1).
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:55, at around 171, the victim D (36 tax) (the representative driver), who was a substitute driver, was at the time sled to the sled sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the sled to the Defendant; and (b) the victim did not have the Defendant’s abusive and verbal abuse; and (c) the Defendant set up the vehicle at the above place and contacted the president of the Defendant’s school, who was the representative driver, by telephone.
The Defendant: (a) committed the act of the victim; (b) obstructed the victim’s left face by having flabbbling flaps; and (c) obstructed the victim’s back face by a cell phone in several instances; (d) continuously flabed the golf flab, which is a dangerous object at the trokeke of the Defendant’s vehicle; and (e) obstructed the victim’s left side by the flabing of the flab; and (e) threatened the victim with the escape by the flabing of the flab; (e) flabing of the flab; and (e) flabing of the flab, which is a dangerous object of the flabing of the said golf flab; and (e) flabing of the flab.
As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and inflicted injury on sugars, etc., where there are no two mains in order to provide medical treatment for approximately two weeks.
2. On the same day as the above paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as an offender in the act of committing an act of committing an offense on the 22:10 day; and (b) was transferred to and entered into the E District Office of the Chungcheong Police Station, and assaults the clothes of the slope F (35) belonging to the said E District Unit on one occasion; (c) and (d) was assigned to the tax imposing tax on, and added to, the taxable case where the son lasts of the son.
한번 붙자 나랑 맞짱 뜨자! ”라고 큰소리로 욕설과 폭언을 하였다.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the handling of reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. On-site photographs;
1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;
1. Each police statement on slopeF, G, and D.