except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 27, 2015, from around 01:20 to around 01:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed the intent of “D” operated by the victim C in Jung-gu, Busan; (b) made customers, who had been in the place, engage in a trial to “ception flusium, flusium, and flusium”; and (c) made customers, who had been in the place, take a disturbance, such as flusium and flusium flusium flusium flusium and flusium flusium flusium flusium

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On January 27, 2015, the obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) around 02:15, at the places indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1); (b) the Defendant received a demand from the police officer, a police officer belonging to the Busan Central Police Station, who called the Busan Central Police Station, to move out of the main place after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant avoided the disturbance as above; and (c) E, “I have to move out of the main place”, and “I have to move out of the bitch of bitch, to whom I have come to move out of the main place; and (d) the Defendant took time the shoulder and the breast part of the slope E by hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the above E Assistant 112 Report Case, and at the same time, the Defendant placed a chest in need of approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E.

3. On January 27, 2015, the Defendant committed an assault at the Busan Central Police Station's Criminal Department of the Busan Central Police Station located in Jungdong-dong, Busan, Busan, on the part of the Defendant: (a) on the part of the Defendant: (b) the police officer, who was a police officer working on duty at the above police station, who was arrested and waiting for a flagrant offender at the above office, called “the police officer, who was working on duty at the above police station, shall not have received money for the same feat and feat; and (c) the F head head feat one time by hand; and (d) the Defendant continued to take a bath to F at around 05:0 on the same day, and assaulted F at the right side of F once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the above F police officer's duty and legitimate performance of duties concerning suspect management arrested in flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C, G, E, H.