However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Crane car.

On May 5, 2013, the Defendant operated the Cheongdo-do-do-do-do-myeon on a 11:10-round May 5, 2013, and continued 69 local highways prior to the Cheongdo-do-ri 107, Cheongdo-do-ri, Cheongdo-ri-do-ri, Cheongdo-do-ri-do-ri, along the Do-do-do-ri 60 km away from the Do-do-do-do-ri

Since there is a center line of yellow-ray, which is a narrow right-hand road, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the motor vehicle by thoroughly operating the front line and properly operating the device of the motor vehicle for the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and operated the center line of the road in the course of coming back to one’s lane while driving the vehicle in the course of driving the road, which caused the driver to re-enter the center line to the opposite vehicle, and caused the driver to do so by negligence, the front part of the victim D(W, 59 years old) driving the vehicle driving from the opposite vehicle to the right side of the driver’s vehicle.

After all, the Defendant suffered approximately 8 weeks of medical care from the above occupational negligence to the victim FF (the 56-year old-old) who was on board the above Damdo car, such as a Dam cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Submission of a medical certificate concerning victim D);

1. Article 3(1) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Acts concerning criminal facts;