beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.10.17 2016나59758

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) admitting the judgment of the court of first instance is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., the third to the fourth to the 16th of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the fourth to the 19th of the 19th to the 5th of the 5th of the 19th of the 19th of the judgment

2. Parts in height:

A. First, the Plaintiff occupied each of the land in this case by planting 20 weeks of high-speed trees, 20 weeks of shot tree, 4 weeks of shot tree, and growing pigs and shot water. In particular, the Plaintiff asserted to the effect that the Plaintiff’s exclusive possession of each of the land in this case was proven from the fact that swine reduction was discovered on I’s land, and that it was left abandoned on I’s surrounding land after shotization work.

According to Gap evidence No. 15 and the request for the delivery of documents to the Head Office of the first instance court to the Head Office of Mountainous District Prosecutors' Office, swine reduction was discovered in I land, and the removed tree residuess were left unattended at the site while in the process of flating work on I land. However, as a result of the first instance court's on-site inspection, the following circumstances revealed according to Eul evidence No. 10 and Eul evidence No. 10 and the overall purport of the pleading are as follows. ① If the land of this case was conducted by the Korea Land Information Corporation in the course of the cadastral survey conducted by the Korea Land Information Corporation on each of the instant land, trees and grasss were cut down, and under this, there is a slope surface. This is the fact that the above cadastral survey result shows that there were considerable parts of the I land, and ② the above cadastral survey result of the above cadastral survey result shows that the photo prior to the completion of flatization work on the land before I, ③ the size of the tree tree 20, the area of the tree tree 1, etc.