If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

1. Defendant A: (a) around July 4, 2017, around 01:10, at the macroscopic store run by C Victim D, the relationship of debt was found in the “E” store, but the victim did not open the entrance, and (b) the entrance door was set up in favor of reinforcement.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property equivalent to about 3.10,000 won of the market price.

2. 피고인 B 피고 인은 위 제 1 항과 같은 날 같은 장소에서, 위와 같은 이유로, 위 매장에 있던 피해자의 머리채를 두 손으로 잡아 흔들어 넘어뜨리고, 넘어져 있는 피해자의 목과 어깨를 발로 찼다.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as climatic salt, tension, etc. requiring treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraph (D), on-site, images of victims, and quotations;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and defendant A who choose a sentence: Article 366 of the Criminal Act; Defendant B who choose a fine: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; and Article

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act