At around 14:20 on October 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the police officer F, who belongs to the Steering Police Station Emb box called to the site, to the effect that “the male who gets involved in the D urban bus is attempting and threatening” on the front of the C Hospital located in B, and served as assaulting the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s demand for identification card by the police officer F, who was called to the site, and the Defendant’s demand for identification card; (b) the Defendant’s own hand, sealed the f’s worship and the chest part; and (c) the Defendant was walking

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the booms video images and to the booms video CDs

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor under Article 136(1) of the relevant law on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the punishment of a crime: In light of the fact that the nature of the crime is inferior by assault, etc. committed against a police officer in charge of handling 112 reports; the degree of tangible power used is not less weak; and that there are several favorable records of punishment for violent crimes: The defendant's family relation, age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and other factors of sentencing under each subparagraph of Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as circumstances after the crime, etc.