On December 27, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 19:00, and led the Defendant to change the course to the one-lane, while driving the said car along the two-lanes into the intersection of the shooting distance in front of the chemical terminal located in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu.

Since there is a road near the intersection where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, if there is another vehicle running along the one lane according to the right edge of the road and the defendant intends to change the course in accordance with the new subparagraph, the driver has a duty of care to safely circumvent, such as yielding the course of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the right of way from the port side of the instant benz car by the victim C (I am, 47 years old) who driven at the right side of the instant fenp car in accordance with the Mar. 1, 200.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, shocked the front body part of the vehicle before the left-hand side of the benz's car.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the above ice car in a way that is equivalent to KRW 5,935,820 as repair cost on the said ice car.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

B. On November 20, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, a written agreement containing the intent of the victim that the defendant does not want to be punished.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;