2. It seems that the judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that the victim's degree of injury is relatively not more severe, that the victim does not want punishment against the defendant, that the defendant does not have any criminal power in Korea, but it is reflected in the sentencing of the court below.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant on the ground that the defendant was dissatisfied with the victim's face, causing an injury to the victim's face and face, and the nature of the crime was extremely bad, and the risk of the defendant's act is considerably high in light of the equity in sentencing with the same or similar incidents, the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, and the circumstances after the crime were committed, etc., it cannot be deemed that the court below's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.