except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:45 on July 9, 2013, the Defendant argued with a person who is unable to know his name in Gyeyang-gu, Annyang-dong 782-19, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-dong, 782-19. In this case, the victim B (the age of 71) who had been living in the area said area referred to as "whether he is a person who was suffering from drinking," and the victim B (the age of 71) who was living in the area said as "Is the person who was suffering from drinking," was 1staritha, the Defendant spathatha, and spathathatha, the victim's spathathatha, and the victim's face, and the victim was spathatha, etc., who

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The Defendant of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, even if having been punished several times, is not guilty of the crime of this case. However, considering the agreement with the victim and the depth of the crime, the Defendant shall be determined as the same as the disposition of this case.