beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.03.24 2020고단10866

관세법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

If it is intended to import or return goods, the name, standard, quantity, price, etc. of the relevant goods shall be reported to the head of a customs office.

1. On May 2015, the Defendant received a proposal from B to transport gold bars to China from May 2015, and accepted the proposal.

The Defendant entered the Incheon International Airport from Cheongdo around May 16, 2015 to the Incheon International Airport, and at the same time 28,228,200g of the market price of the offense.

In addition, from January 4, 2017, three gold bars were concealed in one’s port, brought into the customs collector without filing an import declaration. From that time, up to January 4, 2017, the gold bars amounting to KRW 2,114,338,60, total market price of 2,114,38,600 through the same method, such as the one in the attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the head of the customs office B, imported gold bars without filing an import declaration.

2. On May 2017, the Defendant received a request for the transport of gold bars from the Defendant, who was a wife around May 2017, and accepted the request.

On May 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around May 26, 2017, in a tax-free zone located in the Incheon International Airport Exchange; (b) around 39,793,600 foot equivalent to 200g, the market price of the offense that was brought by a person who was in

A total of 19 times from April 25, 2018, 4 gold bars were stored in his/her port, concealed and returned to the head of a customs office without filing a return report, and returned them to Japan. From that time, from that time, up to April 25, 2018, the gold bars returned 15.2 km in total equivalent to the total market price of 767,870,40 won by the same method, such as the gold bars 2 attached hereto.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the head of the customs office B, returned gold bars without filing a return report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (a copy of the protocol of examination of suspect) to the defendant's legal statement C, by the examination and reporting (a list No. 17);

1. Article 269(2)1 of the Customs Act and Article 241(1) of the same Act (the point of smuggling) for criminal facts and the selection of punishment.