2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized that the crime of this case is not good, such as taking a bath to police officers and finding out the Public Security Center with a minute, and attaching an entrance, etc.

However, in full view of various circumstances, including the Defendant’s character and conduct, intelligence and environment, the background leading up to the instant crime, the means and method of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable. In so doing, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible, and thus, is unreasonable, given that the Defendant’s mother visited the Public Security Center on the following day following the instant crime and accepted the entire damaged part, the Defendant was able to guide the Defendant in the future, and the Defendant is still working to deliver to the young age, etc.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.