2. The lower court, based on its reasoning of sentencing, sentenced the Defendant to the above punishment, and there is no change in circumstances that may be newly considered in the trial.

In particular, in the case of the crime of fraud of this case, it is difficult to view that the damage amount of individual cases is relatively large due to its characteristics as a crime using a high-speed trading place on the Internet, but it is necessary to strictly punish the victims in terms of disturbing the order of electronic commerce and impairing trust among many and unspecified Internet users.

In addition, even if the sentencing conditions of the defendant's character, home environment, economic form, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime were examined, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.