However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 15:00 on November 23, 2014, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fluence), administered approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs for a single-use World Cup (fluoron) in the form of dilution and math, in front of the Defendant’s dwelling in mass-si C, a type of psychotropic drug.

2. On November 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to pay money before the victim D’s residence; (b) however, the Defendant was unable to enter the victim’s place of residence; (c) thereby, caused the lock-up devices of the above gate to display the lock-up devices of the materials of the Switzerland lease owned by the victim; (d) continuously string the string of the strings; and (e) continuously frighted the strings with the strings; and (e) caused the wall to be cut off and the strings of the wall to be cut off; and (e) damaged KRW 696,00,00 of the repair cost to be incurred by the outside of the part of the victim’s residence; and (e) KRW 696,00,00,000 of the repair cost to be incurred by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Statement of transactions;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on the calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Article 36 of the Criminal Act (the point of administering psychotropic drugs), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying and damaging property) - Selection of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime for the past ten years, and the fact that the person has been detained for a considerable period of time in this case, and that the error has been remarkably divided);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;