However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 29, 2013, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay KRW 879,666 won on October 25, 2013 from October 25, 2013 to October 25, 2018,” and that “The Defendant would pay KRW 43,90,000 out of KRW 51,730,000,000 from October 29, 2013 to October 25, 2018, while the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to normally repay a loan to purchase a vehicle to use it as a collateral from a bond company, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the loan to use it as a collateral.” The Defendant had the victim acquire an amount of money equivalent to the said amount of money by having the employee of the Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd. acquire the profits of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the same shall not apply, and no penalty shall be imposed);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;