beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2014.09.02 2014고정41

상해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 1, 2014, around 08:00, the injured Defendant talked with the victim about the issue of the victim E (year 52)’s father’s house and the boundary of the Defendant’s house fence in front of the D community hall located in the Jeonbuk-gun, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by flabing the victim’s hand by putting the victim’s finger hand over, and flabing the victim’s hand into a hand by flabing the victim’s hand for about two weeks, which requires treatment.

2. On March 1, 2014, at around 14:30 on March 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) discovered the boundary of the fence with the body of the victim E, who was in the “F of the Jeon Chang-gun,” and then threatened the victim by stating, “When the construction is carried out, she will be stamped at all on the ground.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of the investigation report (related to attachment of the medical certificate for injury)

1. There is no fact that the Defendant did not have the victim’s grandchildren, and there is no fact that he threatened the victim due to blue blue, etc.

2. On the basis of the judgment, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is considered as a whole, and the victim's statement is consistent from the investigative agency to this court to the following circumstances: (i) the victim inflicted an injury upon the victim by stating to the effect that "the defendant would have been able to live at a long age before the community center," stating that "the defendant would have been able to live at a long age; anyone would be able to take his/her hand before the community center; and (ii) the defendant also sustained the victim's statement by stating to the effect that "the defendant would be able to affix his/her seal when carrying out the construction work."