If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a taxi passenger of the victim B for business purpose C.

On September 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40 on September 14, 2013, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force for about 30 minutes, such as: (c) the victim’s getting in the taxi of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and having arrived at the 1105-2 office building distance of Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, the destination of which was scheduled to reduce the taxi expenses while drunk; and (d) the victim requesting the taxi to get off from the taxi to get off from the taxi, “I are well drinking and well live well,” and not getting out of the taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;